(The meter window is on the internal screen so it doesn't itself take up bandwidth.) 320Mbps seems to be a hard upper limit on the bandwidth it'll take on any interface, but it also seems sufficient. (I can play those on the real 4K monitor attached.) It comes with a bandwidth meter (selectable from the app main menu), shown below just after I'd been scribble-dragging this browser window around on the Luna Display. That was expected, and not important to me. Videos are watchable, but don't really keep up in full screen, so frames get dropped. In further use I may yet find that the ethernet gets more contention than the direct thunderbolt would, but that's not been an issue yet. seems to work as well as the direct thunderbolt connection did although as noted, I am pushing it to prioritise the traffic, whereas the thunderbolt connection was fast enough without changing any defaults. I needed to opt-open prefs and set a connectivity rate to manual and drag it all the way to maximum (40MB/s / 320Mbps) and this. I'm also trying using a Thunderbolt 3 dock (Caldigit TS3), with the Luna Display dongle connected to the onward-facing thunderbolt port on the dock, and a real 4K monitor connected to the dock's DisplayPort, and using an ethernet connection from the dock, via a nearby switching hub (into which the iMac is also connected). Dragging windows, scrolling windows, using the trackpad is still responsive enough, and that's what I wasn't really expecting to be the case, so it's a bonus as far as I'm concerned. Just a little less smooth than the 60Hz display next to it.) This is acceptable for my use case. (It doesn't definitively tell me, and I tell it manually it can go up to 60Hz, but that's what it feels like. It's probably at the 45fps point, I'm guessing. All I see is that the refresh rate seems a little low. I basically don't see any pixellation or other compression artefacts. With a thunderbolt 3 cable directly connecting the two machines things were much better, and for my purposes entirely usable. I expected that, and always expected to use a wired connection. I did find on a wifi connection it was on the sluggish side latency was too high, and quite a lot of pixellation. I have an older 4K monitor, but the 5K on the iMac spoiled me. I'm a programmer, and most else I do is also mostly text-based, so what I'm looking for is super sharp text, and relative slowness of the display is of less importance. (But I will but it looks like I'll have had a year of use out of this by then.) My use case is, a 2021 MacBook Pro (M1Pro) as the primary, a 2019 iMac Retina 5K as the secondary. Better than expected, and WHEN ? the new Apple monitors come next year the decision to get one is just a little bit harder. (aka: won't be rushed into a too-quick decision by a short-term discount) TL DR: It's brilliant. You see, it's my curse: Nothing is ever on a sale when I've decided I actually want it. ? I was put off from buying during the discounted period by some of the earlier posts in this thread, but eventually went ahead even though it was at full price. Posting late to the thread but others interested in the product might find themselves here anyway on a search so here's to you.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |